The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JI-YOUNG LEE
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1996
Application No. 09/086,312
____________
HEARD: Apr. 2, 2003
____________
Before RUGGIERO, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A patent examiner rejected claims 1, 2, 5-8, 11, and 12. The appellant appeals
therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue on appeal controls an image on a multi-synchronization
mode display. With such a display, the horizontal and vertical position values and the
horizontal and vertical size values of an image displayed thereon vary with the mode of
synchronization. (Paper No. 8 at 2.) The display sets a reference value according to a
specific mode to correspond to each synchronization mode and stores it as shown in
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007