Appeal No. 2002-2033 Page 9
Application No. 08/894,063
The addition of Moetteli to Stolarczyk and Spagnoli with regard to dependent
claims 35, 42 and 53, Gill with regard to dependent claim 37, and Mikic with regard to
dependent claims 48 and 50,3 fails to overcome the aforementioned problems with the
independent claims from which they depend, as explained with regard to claim 34.
These rejections are not sustained.
CONCLUSION
None of the rejections are sustained.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
3This was a second rejection of claims 48 and 50.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007