Appeal No. 2002-2055 Page 2 Application No. 09/727,547 BACKGROUND The appellants’ invention relates to a method of reducing by-product deposition inside wafer processing equipment. The examiner rejected claims 9, 11 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Comita et al. U.S. Patent Application Publication US2001/0008618A1 of July 19, 2001 (Comita), claims 9-12 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Comita, and claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Comita in view of Nozaki et al. Japanese Kokai Patent Application SHO 61-117824 of June 5, 1986 (Nozaki). The appellants did not traverse the rejections made by the examiner. Their sole argument was that Comita was not a proper reference because its effective filing date did not precede the filing date of their own U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/070,697, which was filed on January 7, 1998, and which in their view established a constructive reduction to practice of the invention disclosed in the present application. However, Provisional Patent Application No. 60/070,697 became abandoned one year later by virtue of 35 U.S.C. § 111(b)(5), and therefore was not copending with the parent of the present application. The appellants admitted that the present application was not entitled to the effective filing date of their provisional application, however, they argued that the provisional application “establishes a constructive reduction to practice or conception with diligence prior to the filing date of Comita,” and therefore bars Comita from beingPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007