Ex Parte OSA - Page 4




                    Appeal No. 2002-2064                                                                                                                                  
                    Application No. 08/902,330                                                                                                                            


                              a comparator to compare the difference with a threshold                                                                                     
                    value;                                                                                                                                                
                              an adder to add value to the pixel signal levels in the                                                                                     
                    vicinity of block boundary in accordance with the result of the                                                                                       
                    comparison;                                                                                                                                           
                              a generator to generate at least a random number; and                                                                                       
                              a selector to select a value pattern including said values                                                                                  
                    which are fixed differential values from a plurality of value                                                                                         
                    patterns based on the random numbers.                                                                                                                 
                                                                           References                                                                                     
                              The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:                                                                                    
                    Moronaga et al.                                  5,229,864                                         Jul. 20, 1993                                      
                    (Moronaga)                                                                                                                                            
                    Honjo                                            5,337,088                                         Aug.  9, 1994                                      
                                                                   Rejection at Issue                                                                                     
                              Claims 1, 3-6, 8-13 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                                   
                    § 103 as being unpatentable over Honjo in view of Moronaga.1                                                                                          
                              In our opinion, we will make reference to the briefs2 and                                                                                   
                    answer.                                                                                                                                               




                              1 The Examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claim 16 under                                                                                
                    35 U.S.C. § 102 and has now rejected claim 16 under 35 U.S.C.                                                                                         
                    § 103.  See page 3 of the Examiner's answer.                                                                                                          
                              2 Appellant filed an appeal brief on November 30, 2001.                                                                                     
                    Appellant filed a reply brief on April 8, 2002.  The Examiner                                                                                         
                    mailed an office communication on June 17, 2002, stating that the                                                                                     
                    reply brief has been entered and considered.                                                                                                          
                                                                                    44                                                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007