Appeal No. 2002-2064 Application No. 08/902,330 a comparator to compare the difference with a threshold value; an adder to add value to the pixel signal levels in the vicinity of block boundary in accordance with the result of the comparison; a generator to generate at least a random number; and a selector to select a value pattern including said values which are fixed differential values from a plurality of value patterns based on the random numbers. References The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows: Moronaga et al. 5,229,864 Jul. 20, 1993 (Moronaga) Honjo 5,337,088 Aug. 9, 1994 Rejection at Issue Claims 1, 3-6, 8-13 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Honjo in view of Moronaga.1 In our opinion, we will make reference to the briefs2 and answer. 1 The Examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claim 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and has now rejected claim 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. See page 3 of the Examiner's answer. 2 Appellant filed an appeal brief on November 30, 2001. Appellant filed a reply brief on April 8, 2002. The Examiner mailed an office communication on June 17, 2002, stating that the reply brief has been entered and considered. 44Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007