Ex Parte REISINGER et al - Page 4





                 Appeal No. 2002-2065                                                                                   Page 4                     
                 Application No. 09/398,688                                                                                                        



                         extending past a connection point of the arc-shaped ring with the                                                         
                         intermediate ring and toward a center of the one of the                       bottom and                                  
                         cover, and                                                                                                                

                                           wherein the section, which extends past the connection point of the                                     
                                  arc-shaped ring with the intermediate ring, has a thickness which                                                
                                  constantly decreases from the connection point to an inner edge of this                                          
                                  section.                                                                                                         

                         It is the examiner’s view that all of the subject matter recited in claim 16 is                                           

                 disclosed in GB 032 except for the section which extends past the connection point of                                             

                 the arc-shaped ring with the intermediate ring having a thickness which constantly                                                

                 decreases from the connection point to an inner edge of the section (Answer. pages 3                                              

                 and 4).  According to the examiner, it would have been obvious2 to modify the structure                                           

                 of GB 032 to provide this feature, in view of the teachings of either of the secondary                                            

                 references.  Among the arguments raised by the appellants in opposition to this                                                   

                 rejection are two which we agree cause this rejection to be fatally defective.                                                    







                         2The test for obviousness is what the combined teachings of the prior art would have suggested to                         
                 one of ordinary skill in the art.  See, for example, In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425, 208 USPQ 871, 881                           
                 (CCPA 1981).  In establishing a prima facie case of obviousness, it is incumbent upon the examiner to                             
                 provide a reason why one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led to modify a prior art reference or                      
                 to combine reference teachings to arrive at the claimed invention.  See Ex parte Clapp, 227 USPQ 972,                             
                 973 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1985).  To this end, the requisite motivation must stem from some teaching,                             
                 suggestion or inference in the prior art as a whole or from the knowledge generally available to one of                           
                 ordinary skill in the art and not from the appellant's disclosure.  See, for example, Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-                   
                 Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1052, 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1439 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 (1988).                             










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007