Appeal No. 2002-2089 Application No. 09/482,237 material having a glass transition temperature within the range defined by appealed claim 1). On page 5 of the answer, the Examiner expresses his opposing viewpoint in the following manner: It would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art to formed the Falco et al. stem member from the material disclosed by Brueggemann et al. because the material have the property of having a glass transition temperature between a range of ambient temperature and the internal human temperature. The property is useful to maintain the stem stiff during the insertion of the earplug and then once inserted the stem would decrease it stiffness to make the earplug comfortable to the user. Manifestly, the Examiner’s above quoted rationale is defective. Neither of the references under consideration contains any disclosure relating to a property involving glass transition temperatures “between a range of ambient temperature and the internal human temperature” (id.) or a property which “is useful to maintain the stem stiff during the insertion of the earplug and then once inserted the stem would decrease in stiffness to make the earplug comfortable to the user” (id.). It is only the Appellant’s specification which contains disclosure of such a property. It is apparent therefore, that the Examiner’s aforequoted conclusion of obviousness is based upon impermissible hindsight. See W.L. Gore & Assocs. v. Garlock Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 44Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007