Ex Parte YAMAGUCHI et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 27              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
         Ex parte NORISHIGE YAMAGUCHI, HIROYUKI MORITA, HIDEAKI TOKUGAWA,             
          KAZUHIRO HASHIMOTO and AKIHIRO SUGAWARA                                     
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2002-2092                                  
                               Application 09/328,467                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                HEARD: April 8, 2003                                  
                                     ___________                                      
          Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                      
          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 7 through 10, and from the              
          examiner’s refusal to allow claims 5 and 6 as amended subsequent            
          to the final rejection in a paper filed June 29, 2001 (Paper No.            
          13).  Claims 1 through 10 are all of the claims pending in this             
          application.1                                                               

               1  As noted in the advisory action mailed July 17, 2001                
          (Paper No. 14), following entry of the amendment of June 29,                
                                                                  (continued...)      
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007