The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte NORISHIGE YAMAGUCHI, HIROYUKI MORITA, HIDEAKI TOKUGAWA, KAZUHIRO HASHIMOTO and AKIHIRO SUGAWARA __________ Appeal No. 2002-2092 Application 09/328,467 ___________ HEARD: April 8, 2003 ___________ Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 7 through 10, and from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 5 and 6 as amended subsequent to the final rejection in a paper filed June 29, 2001 (Paper No. 13). Claims 1 through 10 are all of the claims pending in this application.1 1 As noted in the advisory action mailed July 17, 2001 (Paper No. 14), following entry of the amendment of June 29, (continued...) 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007