The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 67 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID E. MURRAY ____________ Appeal No. 2002-2112 Application No. 08/949,534 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3 through 7, 9 through 13 and 15 through 21. The disclosed invention relates to an apparatus for providing audio, modem and facsimile processing capabilities to a computer system.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007