Ex Parte Crall et al - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2002-2148                                                                  Page 7                
              Application No. 09/627,143                                                                                  


              preferably both of the pressure side 46 and the suction side 48 have a laser shock                          
              peened surface 54 and a pre-stressed region 56 having deep compressive residual                             
              stresses imparted by laser shock peening (LSP) extending into the airfoil 34 from the                       
              laser shock peened surface in the tip section 50 along the blade tip 38 as seen                             
              in Figure 2.  Preferably, the pre-stressed regions 56 are coextensive with the blade tip                    
              38 in the chordwise direction to the full extent of width W1 and are deep enough                            
              into the airfoil 34 to coalesce for at least a part of the width W1.  The laser beam shock                  
              induced deep compressive residual stresses in the compressive pre-stressed regions                          
              56 are generally about 50-150 KPSI (Kilo Pounds per Square Inch) extending from the                         
              laser shock surfaces 54 to a depth of about 20-50 mils into laser shock induced                             
              compressive residually pre-stressed regions 56.                                                             


                     The appellants argue (brief, pp. 5-7) that the subject matter of claims 1, 2 and 8                   
              is not met by Mannava since Mannava does not teach a band under a compressive                               
              stress greater than the body through the entire cross section of the band.  The                             
              examiner responded to this argument (answer, p. 4) by asserting that the claims do not                      
              recite the entire cross section of the band being under a compressive stress greater                        
              than the body.  In the examiner's view, the claims recite only that a compressive stress                    
              greater than the body is in the band.  The appellants strongly disagreed  (reply brief, pp.                 
              1-2)  with the examiner's interpretation of the claimed subject matter.  Specifically, the                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007