Ex Parte OSHIMA et al - Page 12




          Appeal No. 2002-2175                                                        
          Serial No. 09/060,960                                                       


          matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the                   
          invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art.            
          We shall therefore sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                  
          rejection of claim 1, and claims 2 through 5 which stand or fall            
          therewith, as being obvious over a conventional golf glove                  
          package in view of Connell.                                                 


                                      SUMMARY                                         
               Since one of the examiner’s four rejections of claims 1                
          through 5 is sustained, the decision of the examiner to reject              
          these claims is affirmed.                                                   



















                                          12                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007