Appeal No. 2002-2180
Application No. 09/089,011
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1, 17, and 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated
by Conmy is affirmed. The rejection of claims 30 and 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as
being anticipated by Conmy is reversed.
The rejections of claims 2-9, 12-16, 18-23, 29, and 33-35 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Conmy and Jones, and of claims 10, 11, and 24-28 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Conmy, Jones, and Tognazzini, are
reversed.
The examiner’s decision in rejecting claims 1-35 is thus affirmed-in-part.
-7-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007