The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PIUS SCHWELLINGER ____________ Appeal No. 2002-2189 Application No. 09/194,294 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before LIEBERMAN, TIMM, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant appeals the final rejection of claims 16-33 which are all the claims pending in the application. Subsequent to the final rejection, the Examiner withdrew a non-statutory double patenting rejection (Answer at p. 2) and, additionally, withdrew a number of prior art references from a rejection over prior art (Answer at p. 4). Therefore, our review is limited to the two remaining grounds of rejection:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007