Appeal No. 2002-2201 Page 4 Application No. 09/699,539 USPQ 785, 787-788 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection. The examiner has determined that Barkhau discloses an apparatus with associated orifices for forming a cased glass stream from core and skin (casing) glass sources. The examiner acknowledges that Barkhau does not disclose a spout, spout tube for controlling casing glass delivery, and a gas source at continuous elevated pressure coupled to the interior volume of the spout tube, as here claimed. According to the examiner, however: [i]t would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to add the flow orifice and tubular member of McCauley to the apparatus of Barkhau et al because McCauley teaches that the tubular member would have been helpful for controlling the flow of glass through the flow orifice. The glass feeder of McCauley, to which the examiner refers, is constructed for transferring glass from an extension (2, FIG. 1) of a tank or furnace (1, FIG. 1) containing molten glass (14, FIG. 1). The extension has a discharge orifice (upper edge 15 of nozzle 16, FIG. 1) located at a height that is above the level of the molten glass in the tank or furnace and a tubular member (19, FIG. 1) associated therewith. In order to discharge molten glass, McCauley employs a suction pump connected to a pipe (36,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007