Ex Parte LAURILA et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-2207                                                        
          Application 09/057,729                                                      


          The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                            
          apparatus for use in the field of speech recognition.                       
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  A method for recognising speech, wherein a recognisable            
          speech signal is divided in time into successive frames of                  
          specific length, each speech frame is analysed for producing at             
          least one parameter per frame, illustrating the speech signal,              
          said parameters, relating to each frame, are stored in a sliding            
          buffer for minimizing the delay due to the normalization process            
          for calculation of normalisation coefficients for each frame,               
          said parameters are modified utilising said normlisation                    
          coefficients and speech recognition is carried out utilising the            
          modified parameters, wherein only part of the successive                    
          parameters are stored periodically and at least one parameter is            
          modified on the basis of the parameters stored periodically in              
          order to produce said modified parameter, and for said                      
          modification, a standard deviation of said periodically stored              
          parameters is defined, wherein only part of the stored parameters           
          are used at the beginning of the speech recognition.                        
                                                                                     
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Satoh et al. (Satoh)          5,293,588          Mar. 08, 1994              
          Kroeker et al. (Kroeker)      5,369,726          Nov. 29, 1994              
          Claims 1-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                       
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Satoh in view of                
          Kroeker.                                                                    
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the            
          respective details thereof.                                                 




                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007