Ex Parte BILLMERS et al - Page 7




          Appeal No. 2002-2261                                                        
          Application No. 09/568,111                                                  


          1986); In re Klosak, 455 F.2d 1077, 1080, 173 USPQ 14, 16 (CCPA             
          1972).  From our perspective it would appear that the increase in           
          oxygen impermeability associated with both the claimed high                 
          amylose starch and hydrolyzed polyvinyl alcohol would have raised           
          the reasonable expectation that the claimed coating composition             
          would have a superior Gurley porosity compared to a coating                 
          composition not containing a high amylose starch.  Significantly,           
          comparative example 4 of the present specification fails to                 
          identify the amylose content of the Waxy Corn or the degree of              
          hydrolysis of the polyvinyl alcohol.  Hence, it is not clear what           
          specific compositions are being compared in Examples 1 and 4 of             
          the specification.                                                          
               In conclusion, based on the foregoing, it is our judgment              
          that the evidence of obviousness presented by the examiner                  
          outweighs the evidence of nonobviousness proffered by appellants.           
          Accordingly, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed                 
          claims is affirmed.                                                         









                                         -7-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007