Appeal No. 2002-2261 Application No. 09/568,111 1986); In re Klosak, 455 F.2d 1077, 1080, 173 USPQ 14, 16 (CCPA 1972). From our perspective it would appear that the increase in oxygen impermeability associated with both the claimed high amylose starch and hydrolyzed polyvinyl alcohol would have raised the reasonable expectation that the claimed coating composition would have a superior Gurley porosity compared to a coating composition not containing a high amylose starch. Significantly, comparative example 4 of the present specification fails to identify the amylose content of the Waxy Corn or the degree of hydrolysis of the polyvinyl alcohol. Hence, it is not clear what specific compositions are being compared in Examples 1 and 4 of the specification. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, it is our judgment that the evidence of obviousness presented by the examiner outweighs the evidence of nonobviousness proffered by appellants. Accordingly, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. -7-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007