Ex Parte LISSY et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and         
                                                 is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                                                                                       Paper No. 24              
                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                      Ex parte DARIA N. LISSY, SANJAY B. SHARMA,                                                 
                                                     and DAVID S. SHIHABI                                                        
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                                      Appeal No. 2002-2266                                                       
                                                   Application No. 09/366,477                                                    
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                          ____________                                                           
               Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                     
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This appeal involves claims 1-20 which are all the claims pending in the application.  We                  
               have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                    















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007