Appeal No. 2002-2277 Application No. 09/297,527 by the examiner on this record. Accordingly, we must conclude that the examiner has not made out a prima facie case of obviousness for the claimed subject matter. In addition, we are not satisfied that the examiner has satisfied his burden of analyzing the specification evidence of unexpected results relied upon by appellants. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, we are constrained to reverse the examiner's rejection. REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) CHUNG K. PAK ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) THOMAS A. WALTZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -4-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007