Appeal No. 2002-2300 Page 5
Application No. 09/186,212
We therefore will sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 1, as well as the like
rejection of claims 2, 7, 8, 13 and 14, which the appellant has chosen to group with
claim 1 (Supplemental Brief, page 3).
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 13 and 14 as being anticipated by Strom is
sustained.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007