Appeal No. 2002-2308 Application No. 08/943,889 We have not sustained the rejection of claims 6, 8, 9 and 16-19 under either 35 U.S.C. § 103 or under obviousness-type double patenting. Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is reversed. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) ERROL A. KRASS ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LEE E. BARRETT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) EK/RWK -8–Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007