The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALEXANDER HAEUSSLER and HELMUT WISS
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0085
Application No. 09/463,925
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 12 through 16, 18, 20 through 26, 28, 30 and
31. Claims 17, 19, 27 and 29, the only other claims remaining in
the application, have been objected to by the examiner, but are
indicated to be allowable if rewritten in independent form
including all of the limitations of the base claim and any
intervening claims. Claims 1 through 11 have been canceled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007