The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 37 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MICHAEL FRANCIS WEBER and ANDREW JOHN OUDERKIRK ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0090 Application No. 09/006,379 ____________ Heard: May 8, 2003 ____________ Before WALTZ, TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 21-25, 27-34, and 56. Claims 1-20 and 35-54, the only other claims pending in the application, stand withdrawn from consideration pursuant to a restriction requirement. We have jurisdiction over the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007