Ex Parte STONE - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0092                                                        
          Application No. 09/432,525                                                  


               a sensor mechanism mounted on the base and affecting a                 
          perimeter of the base; and                                                  
               a guard operably connected to the base and mounted over said           
          sensor mechanism and adapted to activate the sensor mechanism               
          when pressure is exerted upon the guard;                                    
               thereby providing a means for interrupting a descent of the            
          platform in response to an object encroaching said perimeter of             
          the base and exerting pressure on the guard.                                
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Martin                        3,466,411             Sep. 09, 1969           
          Yeakle                        5,379,655             Jan. 10, 1995           
          Kemmerer et al.               5,931,532             Aug. 03, 1999           
          (Kemmerer)                                                                  
               Appellant's claimed invention is directed to a lift table              
          comprising, inter alia, a sensor mechanism mounted on the base              
          having a guard operably connected to the base and mounted over              
          the sensor mechanism.  When pressure is exerted upon the guard,             
          the descent of a platform is interrupted as a safety measure.               
               Appealed claims 1, 4-6, 8-13, 15 and 20 stand rejected under           
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Yeakle in view of                
          Kemmerer.  Claims 14 and 16-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Yeakle in view of Kemmerer and             
          Martin.                                                                     




                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007