Ex Parte Carter - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2003-0104                                                                 Page 2                
              Application No. 09/659,792                                                                                 


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The appellant's invention relates to an insulated container for a beer keg                          
              (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the dependent claims under appeal is set forth in the                    
              appendix to the appellant's brief.  Claims 1, 7 and 11, the independent claims on                          
              appeal, read as follows:                                                                                   
                     1.     An insulated container for keg beer, wherein the improvement comprises                       
                     a securement on the container for a spigot of a keg tap, the securement                             
                     comprising a band (15) into which a spigot-handle (25) may be maintained                            
                     hooked by twist on the spigot resulting from weight of a spigot tube (21) and any                   
                     beer in the tube acting from a combined center of gravity outwards from the                         
                     container, with a spigot spout (27) pointing downwards.                                             
                     7.     An insulated container for keg beer, wherein the improvement comprises                       
                     a pocket on the container for beer cups, the pocket having a closed bottom.                         
                     11. An insulated container for keg beer, wherein the improvement comprises                          
                     the container sized for a tight fit with a keg and an airflow passageway to allow                   
                     air flow into the container when the keg is removed.                                                


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                     
              appealed claims are:                                                                                       
              Leslie                             4,759,077                           July 19, 1988                       
              Pulli                              6,082,896                           July 4, 2000                        
              Hussain                     GB  2 221 292 A                            Jan. 31, 1990                       












Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007