The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KLAUS HARTMANN, BERNHARD WAGENSOMMER,
and MICHAEL KRUEGER
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0119
Application No. 09/569,477
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 11 and
12. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the
application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to a method for synchronous
transfer of printed sheets. A basic understanding of the
invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 11, a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007