Appeal No. 2003-0131 Application 09/533,060 In applying Mueller against independent claims 1 and 10 (see page 3 in the answer), the examiner focuses on the sensor at 206 and finds that such is adjustably coupled via a threaded connection to a stamped cover pan. The examiner concedes, however, that Mueller does not respond to the limitations in claim 1, and the corresponding limitations in claim 10, requiring the stamped cover pan to include a boss having a generally planar mounting surface for aligning and mounting the sensor. To overcome this admitted deficiency, the examiner looks to Hilker. Hilker discloses a speed sensing differential axle assembly 10 comprising, inter alia, a carrier 12, a rotatable case 14, a ring gear 20, an access cover plate 34, and a transducer 40 mounted on the access cover plate for sensing the rotational speed of the case. Finding that Hilker’s speed sensor 40 is mounted on a boss on the access cover plate 34, the examiner concludes that it would have been obvious in view of Hilker “to include a boss in the pan of Mueller to provide a flat surface for aligning the sensor, ensuring the accurate position of the sensor” (answer, page 3). 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007