The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN P. STREICH, DANIEL G. FINDLE,
PATRICK S. KEENAN and DAVID NAMEY JR.
_____________
Appeal No. 2003-0187
Application No. 09/134,109
______________
HEARD: November 5, 2003
_______________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 7 through 12, 14, 15, 20, 33, 35,
38, 39, 41, 44 through 61, 64 and 65. Claims 5, 62, 63 and 68
stand allowed. Claims 21 through 32, 34, 66 and 67, which are the
only other claims remaining in the application, have been
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007