Ex Parte SVEJK - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2003-0280                                                                  Page 7                
              Application No. 09/382,120                                                                                  


                     The pressure-sensitive adhesive coating (26) of Montecalvo is not either                             
              (1) inherently essentially unaffected by high humidity or (2) inherently able to retain its                 
              adhesiveness in environments having a relative humidity of more than about 50%.                             
              Likewise, the pressure-sensitive adhesive coating (26) Montecalvo is not inherently a                       
              relatively hydrophobic material.  In our view, the prior art of pressure-sensitive                          
              adhesives clearly establishes (1) that some pressure-sensitive adhesives are                                
              essentially unaffected by high humidity and thus able to retain their adhesiveness in                       
              environments having a relative humidity of more than about 50%; and (2) that some                           
              pressure-sensitive adhesives are affected by high humidity and thus lose their                              
              adhesiveness in environments having a relative humidity of more than about 50%.  As                         
              such, the pressure-sensitive adhesive coating (26) Montecalvo does not inherently                           
              possess  the functional characteristics set forth in the claims under appeal.                               


                     Since the subject matter of claims 1-3, 8 and 9 is not disclosed in Montecalvo for                   
              the reasons set forth above and the examiner has not set forth any rationale as to why                      
              it would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person of ordinary                       
              skill in the art to have modified Montecalvo to arrive at the claimed subject matter, the                   
              decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 3, 8 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is                          
              reversed.                                                                                                   









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007