Ex Parte GARCIA - Page 4


                  Appeal No. 2003-0362                                                                                                                    
                  Application 09/439,973                                                                                                                  

                  likelihood of success, viewed in light of the prior art. [Citations omitted] Both the suggestion and                                    
                  the expectation of success must be founded in the prior art, not in the applicant’s disclosure.”).                                      
                           Indeed, at best, the combination of Takado and von Bonin would have reasonably                                                 
                  suggested to one of ordinary skill in this art to coat the plastic tank of Takado with the                                              
                  intumescent mass of von Bonin, which, of course, does not result in appellant’s claimed                                                 
                  invention.  See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1050-54, 5 USPQ2d 1434,                                            
                  1438-41 (Fed. Cir.).                                                                                                                    
                           The examiner’s decision is reversed.                                                                                           
                                                                       Reversed                                                                           








                                             BRADLEY R. GARRIS                                     )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             CHARLES F. WARREN                                     )   BOARD OF PATENT                                    
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )        APPEALS AND                                   
                                                                                                   )      INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             THOMAS A. WALTZ                                       )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      










                                                                          - 4 -                                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007