Appeal No. 2003-0399 Application No. 08/774,150 Positioning of the rod (97), seen in Figures 4, 7 and 10 of Stanley, determines whether subsequent operation of the electric motor (91) on the bed will rotate the high-low shaft (31), the knee screw shaft (57), or the head screw shaft (67). Note particularly the disclosure of Stanley at column 7, lines 32-58. Thus, the levers (109) of Stanley merely act as "selector levers" for displacing rod (97) and determining which one of selector gears (93, 94, 95) seen in Figure 7 will be operative when the motor (91) is subsequently energized. As urged by appellant in the brief (page 5), it follows from this understanding of the operation of the levers (109) that movement of levers (109) does not actuate said actuator of the bed for actuating the support frame in articulated movement, as required in claim 9 on appeal. Energization of the electric motor (91) in Stanley is controlled by one or the other of the two micro switches (115, 116), which switches are caused to operate by movement of remote control means in the form of manually operable slides (128, 129) working through Bowden cables (126, 127) to move switch bars (122, 123). See column 7, line 59 thru column 8, line 71 and Figures 1, 2, 4-7 and 10 of Stanley. 66Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007