Ex Parte MURPHY - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0413                                                        
          Application 09/148,262                                                      


                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellant claims a plastic article which has been formed           
          in a specified molding apparatus.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                 
               1.  An article of manufacture comprising a finished                    
          configuration having an enhanced surface and made of plastic                
          formulated to eliminate or reduce the need to include a release             
          agent and formed by molding the plastic in a mold having at least           
          one metal base, a mold cavity at least partially defining the               
          plastic configuration, and at least one self-lubricating surface            
          layer having a substantially uniform thickness for further                  
          defining the plastic configuration within the mold cavity, the at           
          least one self-lubricating surface layer including a porous                 
          metallic skin including a plurality of substantially uniformly-             
          shaped projections integrally connected to and extending from an            
          interior surface of the at least one metal base and lubricating             
          particles disposed on the skin and in pores of the skin, wherein            
          the lubricating particles are bonded together to form a sealed              
          surface of the at least one self-lubricating surface layer                  
          whereby the finish of the molded plastic configuration is further           
          defined to provide the enhanced surface.                                    


                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Niederst et al. (Niederst)           5,300,334     Apr.  5, 1994            
          Baumgartner et al. (Baumgartner)     5,535,980     Jul. 16, 1996            
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                  
          follows: claims 1-15, 19 and 21-27 over Niederst, and claims 1-14           
          and 19-27 over Baumgartner.                                                 





                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007