Ex Parte HIRSCH - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0415                                                        
          Application No. 08/765,258                                                  


               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
                    1.  A method of controlling a communication between a             
               personal computer and a facsimile terminal, the facsimile              
               terminal connected to the personal computer via an interface           
               and having an integrated communication device and a                    
               connected telephone terminal, comprising the steps of:                 
                    operating, using a main memory of the personal                    
               computer, a link to the facsimile terminal;                            
                    entering commands into the personal computer for the              
               telephone terminal;                                                    
                    converting the commands, at a user control unit which             
               is assigned to the personal computer, into first control               
               commands for the facsimile terminal, into special control              
               commands; and                                                          
                    establishing an outgoing voice link of the connected              
               telephone terminal using the special control commands.                 
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Wong et al. (Wong)            5,631,745      May  20, 1997                  
                                                  (filed Nov.  7, 1994)               
          Saulsbury                     5,801,757      Sep.  1, 1998                  
                                                  (filed May  16, 1994)               
               Claims 1 through 8 and 10 through 17 stand rejected under              
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Saulsbury.                    
               Claims 9 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          being unpatentable over Saulsbury in view of Wong.                          
               Reference is made to the brief (paper number 22) and the               
          answer (paper number 23) for the respective positions of the                

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007