Ex Parte EILERS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0423                                                        
          Application No. 09/377,015                                                  

          of outwardly swinging doors when the panel ruptures.  Claim 22 is           
          illustrative:                                                               
               22. A recloseable container having walls defining an                   
          interior which, when said container is closed, is subjected to at           
          least one of a first and a second pressure, said first pressure             
          much lower than said second pressure, said container comprising:            
               a highly rigid integral panel at least partially forming one           
          of the container walls, said panel having an interior surface               
          exposed to said interior of said container, and an opposite,                
          exterior surface, said panel having an unruptured state at said             
          first pressure, said panel urged into a ruptured state in                   
          response to an increase in interior pressure from said first                
          pressure to said second pressure; and                                       
               means for forming a pair of outwardly swinging doors in said           
          panel as said panel is urged into its said ruptured state, said             
          doors being open and attached to said panel in said ruptured                
          state.                                                                      

                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Kinuta                          6,180,279          Jan. 30, 2001            
          (filed Dec.  9, 1997)                                                       
          Takada et al. (Takada)          6,210,825          Apr.  3, 2001            
          (§ 102(e) date Aug. 12, 1998)                                               
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1-21 and 23-29            
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, written description                 
          requirement, and claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                    
          unpatentable over Kinuta in view of Takada.                                 
                                       OPINION                                        
               We reverse the aforementioned rejections.                              

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007