The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte REMIGIUS G. SHATAS, ROBERT R. ASPREY, CHRISTOPHER L.
THOMAS, GREG O'BRYANT, GREG LUTERMAN, and JEFFREY E. CHOUN
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0440
Application No. 09/430,162
____________
HEARD: October 7, 2003
____________
Before RUGGIERO, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 21, 29, and 32, which are all of
the claims pending in this application.
Appellants' invention relates to a split computer with a
processor housed within a first enclosure and with an input
and/or output device controller and a video controller housed
within a second enclosure. Claim 1 is illustrative of the
claimed invention, and it reads as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007