THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in
a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 65
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
______________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
______________________
Ex parte WOLFGAN JAKOBI, BENNO BESLER,
WERNER A. KLUGE-PALETTA,
SUSANN FRIEDRICH, PETER JAUCHEN,
and BODO SZONN
_____________________
Appeal No. 2003-0459
Application 08/727,3281
_____________________
HEARD: JULY 15, 2003
____________________
Before PAK, KRATZ, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection
of claims 15, 16 and 21 through 23. Claims 18 through 20, the remaining claims in the above-
identified reissue application, have been withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as being
drawn to a nonelected invention.
1 Application for patent filed October 8, 1996.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007