Ex Parte VAN DEN BERGH - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2003-0485                                                        
          Application 08/767,249                                                      




          Claims 20 through 22, 24 and 25 stand rejected under                        
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Fabel in view of              
          Linden.                                                                     


          Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                  
          unpatentable over Fabel in view of Frease.                                  


          Claim 23 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                  
          unpatentable over Fabel in view of Linden and Frease.                       


          Rather than reiterate the examiner's full statement                         
          regarding the above-noted rejections and the conflicting                    
          viewpoints advanced by appellant and the examiner with respect to           
          those rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer                
          (Paper No. 34, mailed August 13, 2002) for the examiner's                   
          reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant's brief            
          (Paper No. 33, filed June 18, 2002) for appellant's arguments               
          thereagainst.                                                               





                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007