Ex Parte STAHLECKER et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written         
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                  

                                                                                         Paper No. 34           

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                                  ____________                                                  
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                  
                                         Ex parte WERNER STAHLECKER                                             
                                            and BERTHOLD MUELLER                                                
                                                  ____________                                                  
                                               Appeal No. 2003-0488                                             
                                            Application No. 09/086,286                                          
                                                  ____________                                                  
                                               HEARD: July 16, 2003                                             
                                                  ____________                                                  
             Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
             STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9 and 11-17, all the    
             claims currently pending in the application.                                                       
                   Appellants’ invention pertains to an apparatus for manufacturing a paper can from blanks of  
             packing material.  As explained on page 1 of the specification, the apparatus comprises            
                   processing stations which are arranged one behind the other along a first star wheel         
                   and a second star wheel.  The stations are rotatable in a cyclical motion and comprise       
                   holding devices for the blanks which can be fed to the processing stations one after         
                   the other to be put together and formed one by one.  Material supply stations hold           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007