The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RODERICK CRAIG MOSELY, HONG ZHANG, FUSEN CHEN, and PALO ALTO ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0548 Application No. 09/370,599 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, PAK and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 14-20, 29, 31-35, 38-53, 60-66 and 69-75, which are all of the claims pending in this application.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007