Appeal No. 2003-0580 Application No. 09/139,081 additive to the core and/or sheath polymers (col. 3, lines 20-24). This disclosure in no way indicates that the polymers are not acid dyeable. The appellants argue that the Wilson declaration (filed September 24, 2001, paper no. 15) shows that the claimed invention satisfies a long felt but unsolved need for the most desired characteristics of a carpet fiber (brief, pages 9-12). For the following reasons, this declaration is not effective for overcoming the prima facie case of obviousness of the appellants’ claimed invention. First, Wilson does not show that there was a particular long felt need but, rather, merely indicates that the attendees at town hall meetings would like better carpet fibers. Wilson states that BASF’s town hall meetings resulted in “a list of long felt, but at that time unresolved, industry needs for the most desired characteristics of the ultimate carpet fiber. These needs included stain resistance, dyeability to provide color flexibility at the mill and improved ozone fastness, among other things” (page 2). 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007