Appeal No. 2003-0584 Application No. 09/845,280 and having a flat striking face (14) thereon, and "an alignment means [e.g., 15] extending along a surface of said club shaft and said head in a plane perpendicular to said longitudinal axis of said shaft and parallel to said striking face of said head." It is the last clause of claim 1 that is of concern, in that we do not see how an imaginary plane defined by and including the alignment means on the shaft and head of the golf club can be said to be "perpendicular to said longitudinal axis of said shaft." In that regard, it is not clear to us how a plane can be said to be perpendicular to an axis or line that lies in the plane. Looking at Figures 1 and 2 of the application drawings, we observe that the imaginary plane defined by the alignment means (15) on the shaft (11) and head (13), as viewed for example in Figure 2, would include the longitudinal axis (12) of the shaft and would be considered to be perpendicular to the plane of the paper which also includes shaft axis (12), but that the imaginary plane in question would not be considered to be perpendicular to the line or axis (12). 44Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007