The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DIRK CRAMER ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0595 Application No. 09/294,354 ____________ HEARD: July, 16, 2003 ____________ Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 7- 12, 18-22, 28-33 and 39-42. Claims 43-46 have been allowed and claims 3-6, 13-17, 23-27 and 34-38 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter.1 We REVERSE. 1The status of the claims can be discerned from Papers No. 14 and 23, as confirmed by the index of claims on the inside of the file wrapper.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007