Appeal No. 2003-0599 Application 09/362,149 24 obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of appellants’ invention, we must refuse to sustain the examiner’s rejection of those claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). In summary, since we have refused to sustain any of the rejections before us on appeal, it follows that the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 2 through 14, 16 through 24, 26 and 27 of the present application is reversed. REVERSED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) CEF/dal 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007