Ex Parte KLING et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0606                                                        
          Application No. 09/281,837                                                  


          molten polymer as it exits the die with an aqueous solution of a            
          water-soluble polysaccharide ether, inflating the tube of molten            
          polymer to form a blown tubular film and then collapsing the                
          blown film to a flat web.                                                   
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Savage                     2,831,852                Apr. 22, 1958           
          Salzinger                  3,252,826                May  24, 1966           
          Schirmer                   5,674,607                Oct. 07, 1997           
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a blown film              
          extrusion process for making a flat web of thermoplastic polymer.           
          The process entails contacting the inner surface of the formed              
          tube of molten polymer with an aqueous solution of a water-                 
          soluble polysaccharide ether.  Appellants state in their                    
          specification that "[i]t would be desirable to provide materials            
          which can be used as a sock solution in blown film extrusion                
          processes which exhibit better performance than mineral oil"                
          (page 2, first paragraph).                                                  
               Appealed claims 1-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          being unpatentable over Schirmer in view of Salzinger.                      
               The examiner incorrectly states in the Answer that                     
          "appellant's [sic, appellants'] brief includes a statement that             
          claims 1-9 do not stand or fall together and provides reasons as            
          set forth in 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7) and (c)(8)" (page 2 of Answer,            

                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007