Appeal No. 2003-0607 Application 09/532,968 discussed in connection with figure 3 (see Examiner’s Answer, page 4, last paragraph). See Specification, page 9, line 24- page 10, line 12, which describes the cleaving process. Accordingly, we find that the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie showing of lack of support under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, and the rejection of claims 1-8 is reversed. REVERSED CHUNG K. PAK ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT TERRY J. OWENS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LINDA R. POTEATE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) LRP:psb 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007