The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JIAJIU SHAW
______________
Appeal No. 2003-0631
Application 09/580,232
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before SCHEINER, MILLS, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 6. We note that
on page 3 of Paper No. 4, the examiner has indicated that claims
7 through 19 have been objected to as being dependent upon a
rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in
independent form including all of the limitations of the base
claim and any intervening claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007