Ex Parte KUPPUSAMY et al - Page 1




                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for 
                                publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
            Paper No. 31                                                                               
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                   
                                             ____________                                              
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                      
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                             ____________                                              
                           Ex parte ASHOK KUPPUSAMY, JAMES N. HELFRICH,                                
                                  JOHN DAVID GRIFFIN, and JOE K. YAP                                   
                                             ____________                                              
                                          Appeal No. 2003-0637                                         
                                        Application No. 09/103,414                                     
                                             ____________                                              
                                        Heard : November 6, 2003                                       
                                             ____________                                              
            Before KRASS, DIXON, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                             
            DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                  This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-21,     
            which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                   


                  We REVERSE.                                                                          













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007