Ex Parte Zhao et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and          
                                                  is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                                                                                        Paper No. 16              
                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                          ____________                                                            
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                          ____________                                                            
                             Ex parte WEIZHONG ZHAO, THOMAS W. SMITH, DAVID H. PAN,                                               
                                       WILLIAM M. PREST JR., and SAMUEL KAPLAN                                                    
                                                          ____________                                                            
                                                      Appeal No. 2003-0667                                                        
                                                    Application No. 09/514,699                                                    
                                                          ____________                                                            
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                              
                                                          ____________                                                            
               Before PAK, TIMM, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                 



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                      This appeal involves claims 1, 3-5, 7, 9, and 10.  Claims 11-20, the only other claims                      
               pending in the application, have been withdrawn as not directed to an elected invention (Answer                    
               at p. 2).  We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                       














Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007