The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALES PROKOP
____________
Appeal No. 2003–0681
Application No. 09/169,459
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, TIMM, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1-3, 6-11, 13, 15, and 30 which are all the claims pending in
the application.1 We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1Claims 12, 14, 16-25, and 27-29 were cancelled after the Final Rejection (After-Final Amendment filed
December 19, 2001, Paper No. 17 was entered as per Advisory Action mailed January 18, 2002, Paper No. 18; see
also Answer, p. 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007