Ex Parte CHUBB et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0730                                                        
          Application No. 09/323,650                                                  


               a detector communicating with said filter, said detector               
                    detecting said emitted energy as a measure of said                
                    temperature.                                                      
               The examiner relies upon the following references in the               
          rejection of the appealed claims:                                           
          Stone                           4,523,315           Jun. 11, 1985           
          Dils                            4,576,486           Mar. 18, 1986           
          Readhead                        4,625,389           Dec. 02, 1986           
          Tregay                          4,794,619           Dec. 27, 1988           
          Rose et al. (Rose)              5,447,786           Sep. 05, 1995           
          Milstein et al. (Milstein)      5,601,661           Feb. 11, 1997           
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to an optical                
          temperature sensor comprising, inter alia, an emitter having a              
          selective energy emission band.  According to appellants, "the              
          emitter emits energy within the emission band in response to the            
          temperature of the emitter 12" (page 2 of Brief, fifth                      
          paragraph).                                                                 
               Appealed claims 1, 10, 13, 16 and 17 stand rejected under              
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Dils.  The claims on             
          appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:                     
               (a) claims 2, 3 and 6 over Dils in view of Rose;                       
               (b) claims 4, 5 and 7-9 over Dils in view of Milstein;                 
               (c) claim 11 over Dils in view of Stone;                               
               (d) claim 12 over Dils in view of Tregay; and                          
               (e) claims 14 and 15 over Dils in view of Readhead.                    


                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007