The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 40
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL BECKER, JIM CHASE, CHRISTOPHER PAPA,
and JEFF JONES
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0740
Application No. 09/099,188
____________
HEARD: Aug. 20, 2003
____________
Before WALTZ, TIMM, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, 29 and 30 as
amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated
July 29, 2002, Paper No. 30, entered as per the Advisory Action
dated Aug. 7, 2002, Paper No. 31). Claims 13-15, 17, 19-20 and 29-
30 are the only claims remaining in this application. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007