The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DING-YU CHUNG and YUEHUA LIU
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0754
Application No. 09/553,630
____________
Heard: August 20, 2003
____________
Before WALTZ, TIMM and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 10-16. Claims 1-9 have been
cancelled.
Claim 16 is representative of the subject matter on appeal
and is set forth below:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007